User talk:Mweisgerb

Welcome!

Hello, Mweisgerb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Detroit by Design - 2011 Symposium, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! –Dream out loud (talk) 00:47, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Detroit by Design - 2011 Symposium

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Detroit by Design - 2011 Symposium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Dream out loud (talk) 00:47, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Hello Mweisgerb. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Detroit_by_Design_-_2011_Symposium, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 15:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Detroit symposium

You are welcome to add content to any other article but not the one with which you have a conflict of interest. See the notice above for an explanation of why it is inadvisable and, I'm sorry, but this particular instance is extremely clear-cut: it is advertising and there is nothing you can do that is likely to change this. - Sitush (talk) 15:25, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edited for your approval. Mweisgerb (talk) 15:28, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't got it, sorry. It is advertising. - Sitush (talk) 15:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your correct, I haven't got it: I'm new to this whole process, and feel like I'm running up against a brick wall at every turn. If you would like to take a look at the attached references, stop by the Detroit Public Library to check out the site, look at some of the new photos I've uploaded on my Flickr account (if your across the pond) here, and present your non-biased view about this 3 month event, I'll be in your favor! I'm not one whose looking for proposals to this thing: mostly, as a resident of the city of Detroit, I just want to share what I know, and try my hand at wiki. So far not so good I suppose.. Mweisgerb (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've cut out some of the "advert" stuff for you and tidied up some other bits. The deletion debate lasts 7 days, so do not panic about things just yet. I have real doubts about it surviving but there is time for recovery & I am happy to help. The principle point issue is that you need to establish notability that can be verified using reliable sources.

You do have some sources in the article already, which is great, However, if this event is as significant as you suggest then I would expect to see a lot of coverage in mainstream news media. Has this happened? Can you maybe point me to any examples?

Re: photos, well, they really need to be uploaded to Wikipedia rather than hosted on Flickr etc. But photos are not going to save the article, so right now I owuld concentrate on things that might. - Sitush (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This all sounds very great, and has been rather informative! Currently, I believe that the coverage is on the way. The AIA Detroit really dropped the ball on advertising of the first event, considering it received a number of programs from around the world. However, John Gallagher, of the Detroit Free Press was in attendance to the event. As the 'local architecture writer' for this Newspaper, he may soon do a short piece when the Freep gets a slow news day (as he does every so often). I've been looking for this, to help give credibility to this wiki article, but guess I still will be waiting. Thanks for the help, I guess we shall see how it all goes in the near future. Mweisgerb (talk) 22:23, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep digging and stick something up here as soon as you spot it. I am watching this page & so should pick it up fairly quickly. Meanwhile, get yourself involved in editing other articles. Why not? You're here now, and more than welcome. Don't worry too much about getting things wrong because even the best of us (and I'm not one of those) get it wrong from time to time. You'll learn by the mistakes. - Sitush (talk) 23:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've closed the AFD and moved the article to User:Mweisgerb/Detroit by Design - 2011 Symposium. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback reply

Posted here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_April_22#http:.2F.2Fwww.archdaily.com.2F124741.2Fdetroit-by-design.2F. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]